Accessibility Statement

Multi-year plan and annual plan

WEBQAM is committed to a process of continuous improvement of the accessibility of all its sites.

The multi-year plan sets out the main guidelines and priorities over a three-year period to ensure long-term accessibility. This document must be drafted by the company that owns the site.

The annual plan details the concrete actions implemented each year to correct identified non-conformities and pursue continuous improvement. This document must be drafted by the company that owns the site.

Compliance Status

The site https://www.micfrance.com/ is partially compliant with RGAA version 4.1.

Pages subject to criteria

• Header
• Footer
• Cookie management (native Shopify)
• Welcome
• Contact
• Legal Notices / Accessibility
• Collection page
• Product sheet
• Help
• Authentication
• Basket
• Search result
• Order History

Test results

The compliance audit was conducted by Nathan SANTO at WEBQAM GROUPE. Each RGAA 4.1 criterion was assessed in consultation, resulting in a consensus on the state of compliance. This collaborative process aims to ensure a rigorous and balanced analysis, revealing that 71% of the criteria are met.

Detail

There are 60 applicable criteria out of 106, including:

• Number of criteria met: 43
• Number of non-compliant criteria: 17
• Number of non-applicable criteria: 46

Content not accessible

The contents listed below are not accessible for the following reasons: non-compliance .

Images

• 1.1 – Does each information-carrying image have a text alternative?
• 1.8 – Every text image carrying information, in the absence of a replacement mechanism, must, if possible, be replaced by styled text. Is this rule respected?

Frames

No cases of non-compliance noted.

Colors

• 3.2 – On each web page, is the contrast between the color of the text and the color of its background sufficiently high (except in special cases)?
• 3.3 – On each web page, are the colors used in the interface components or graphic elements carrying information sufficiently contrasted (except in special cases)?

Multimedia

No cases of non-compliance noted.

Paintings

• 5.1 – Does every complex data table have a summary?
• 5.4 – For each data table with a title, is the title correctly associated with the data table?

Links

• 6.1 – Is each link explicit (except in special cases)?

Scripts

• 7.3 – Is each script controllable by the keyboard and by any pointing device (except in special cases)?
• 7.5 – On each web page, are status messages correctly rendered by assistive technologies?

Mandatory elements

No cases of non-compliance noted.

Structuring information

No cases of non-compliance noted.

Presentation of information

• 10.3 – On each web page, does the information remain understandable when style sheets are disabled?
• 10.6 – On each web page, is each link whose nature is not obvious visible in relation to the surrounding text?
• 10.7 – On each web page, for each element receiving focus, is the focus capture visible?
• 10.11 – For each web page, can the contents be presented without loss of information or functionality and without resorting to either vertical scrolling for a window with a height of 256 px, or horizontal scrolling for a window with a width of 320 px (except in special cases)?

Forms

• 11.2 – Is each label associated with a form field relevant (except in special cases)?
• 11.11 – In each form, is the input control accompanied, if necessary, by suggestions to facilitate the correction of input errors?

Navigation

• 12.8 – On each web page, is the tab order consistent?
• 12.9 – On each web page, navigation must not contain keyboard traps. Is this rule respected?

Consultation

No cases of non-compliance noted.

Exemption for disproportionate burden

No inaccessible content was waived for disproportionate burden.

Content not subject to the accessibility obligation

The following elements have been exempted. They have therefore not been subject to a full and detailed audit. However, it has been verified that their presence does not prevent the use and consultation of the rest of the site.

• No content not subject to the accessibility obligation

Preparation of this declaration

This accessibility statement was established on 08/21/2025 .

Update

Technologies used

The technologies used to create the MIC France site are as follows:

• Shopify
• Laravel

Test environment

The restitution tests were carried out in accordance with the RGAA 4.1 reference configurations, with the following configuration:

• Google Chrome, Version 139.0.7258.128 (Official Build) (x86_64)
• VoiceOver, Version 13.7.6

Tools for assessing accessibility

• Heading Map
• Disable CSS
• Text Spacing Editor
• Lighthouse
• Color Contrast Checker

Feedback and Contact

It is important to remember that under Article 11 of the February 2005 law: a person with a disability, whether motor, sensory (auditory and visual), mental, cognitive or psychological, has the right to compensation for the consequences of their disability, regardless of the origin of their impairment, their age or their lifestyle.

Webqam therefore invites people who encounter difficulties using the sites to contact it via our contact form so that assistance can be provided (accessible alternative, information and content provided in another form).

You can also send a message to: accessibilite@webqam.fr

Appeal

This procedure is to be used in the following case: you have reported to the website manager an accessibility defect which prevents you from accessing content or one of the portal's services and you have not received a satisfactory response.

• Write a message to the Defender of Rights .
• Contact the Defender of Rights delegate in your region.
• Send a letter by post (free, do not put a stamp) to:
  Défenseur des droits,
  Libre réponse 71120,
  75342 Paris CEDEX 07